In reply toI'm pretty sure that if the label has defaulted on any major area of a written contract (ie: and going into receivership would obviously be a major area!) then in many cases the ownership would revert back to the artist or label that any track was licensed from. Having said that Passion could always sell back catalogue as a 'going concern' or as an asset, if you follow what I'm getting at. I dont know how likely this is but it is possible that the back catalogue could be sold on to another label.
Ade
You would imagine that but unfortunately it is not the case unless there is actually a clause in the agreement stating something to teh effect of 'Any material breach of this agreement unremedied within 30 days of notification in writing shall render it null and void and all rights shall revert to ...." A bancuptcy clause would be needed in this case which would be something like " In the event of label becoming bankrupt all rights shall return unencumbered to artist and may not be assigned" Without them, and most short form 1 page micky mouse agreements knocked up on the back of a fag packet will not have them you are royally fucked.
I had a very similar thing with a pretty large label way back...they had never paid a penny, never sent statements (whoever receives those eh????? from anyone???) took it through solicitors and was told that the contract had NOT been breached and was still valid. Basically unless there is a specific breach clause within the contract you are completely fucked....
However I asume (but get this checked out) it also works the other way in that YOU can do what the fuck you like and if there is no breach clause, likewise, you haven't breached the contract....
So....pretty much as I always say to people these days, most of these contracts are NOT worth the paper they are written on and most of the labels are just tin pot. Do what the fuck you want and don't worry about it. No one is going to sue you for selling your own tune and making a couple of hundred quid which you've been screwed out of in the first place - it will cost them FAR more in legal fees to do anything...and you can always sort things out London stylee

Post edited by owner 27/12/2006 11:15:56